Friday, 22 November 2019

Azimuddin Law Associates info@azimuddinlawassociates.com

NEWS, VIEWS AND LAW NOTES Volume 1. December 2019. Number 3 Editors: ADLA Staff

LAW NEWS:

Oregon Bar USA is considering grant of licensing
without a law degree
WTO News and Views

 WTO Appellate Body issues report in respect
of Brazil on its measure concerning Taxation
and charges.
 WTO Appellate Body releases its report on
Korea regarding Anti-Dumping Duties on
Pneumatic valves from Japan. 
 WTO issues panel report on India on its Export related measures. 





In this issue  News:  Law News  WTO News and Views       Public Opinion: What People expect from lawyers.  Essay:  Appeal Rights in Civil Matters.  Essay Review: The Cost of Corruption  Ideas: How to Build Resilient Law Firm Leadership.  Book Review: Game Changing Attorney  New Developments Views of California Court of Appeal on: Contracts, Criminal Law, Employment and Property Law  Recent Cases: International Tribunal on the rule and rights of an investor. Supreme Court of Pakistan Explains What Constitutes Terrorism. 

2




PUBLIC OPINION

What People Need from Lawyers
“Let justice be done though the heavens may fall.” That is the
Lawyers Credo and that is what lawyers do: It is evident from
history that lawyers have fought for justice. Lawyers fashion the
framework of government and build the institutions that are the
bulwark of free people. Leadership is thus the glory of profession
of law. That is why the voices of lawyers are needed more than
ever.
Whatever one’s beliefs are, lawyers stand concerned about
the polarization of societies that is, dividing the nations? 
Lawyers usually are concerned when public officials mock
the foundations of a country or use racially charged rhetoric that
tears apart the fabric of society. 
3

The truth is that public needs lawyer’s wisdom. They need
lawyer’s expertise. They need lawyer’s ability to see both sides of
an issue, to find common ground, and to bring people together. 
Lawyers are under an obligation to teach their fellow
citizens why societies need an independent judiciary and unbiased
political administration in order to support the view why pluralism
and tolerance are national heritage, and the source of strength. 
Appeal Rights in Civil Mattes

Appealing a Court Decision:

Where an individual or a body corporate feels aggrieved
with a court’s decision or order or decree, one can appeal against
the said order to a higher court.1 An appeal is the judicial
examination of the decision given by a Lower Court.2 The higher
                                             
 1 Right to appeal is statutory and substantive right. It is not merely a procedural right. Statutory right means that it is conferred by a statute.  2 Appeal is an application or petition to a higher authority or a court of law for reconsideration of the decision of a lower authority or an inferior court of law. It is an application or a proceeding for review to be carried out by a higher tribunal of a decision given by a lower one. An appeal is one in which the question is, whether the order of the court from which an appeal is brought was correct on the materials presented before the lower court.” See, Bhil Kanji Bhagwan v. Bhil Karsan Bijal: 2003 GLH (23) 385. 
4

court may allow or reject the appeal or even can impose a harsher
penalty3. 
Appeals:
The Code of Civil Procedure 1908, prescribes the rights,
obligations and procedure for filing the appeals in civil matters.4
An appeal lies against an original decree, appellate decree or an
order. These appeals can be filed within the prescribed time limit5. 
Nature of an Appeal:
An appeal is a continuation of the dispute between the parties. An
appeal is required to be in the form of a memorandum
accompanied by the copy of decree or order appealed against.6 
Who can Appeal?
As a general principle, no one can appeal unless: (i) one is a
party to the proceedings or was treated as such; (ii) one is the                                               
 3 It would, therefore, be appropriate to get a legal advice before opting for an appeal.  4 In Sections 96 to 111 read with Order XLI to XLV of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Order XLI to XLII provide procedure for institution of appeals both from original and appellate decrees.   5 See Limitation Act, 1908. Generally period provided for filing an appeal is one calendar month.  6 Provisions of order XLI to order XLII of code of Civil Procedure, 1908 provide detailed procedure, and the way how the appeals are to be conducted.
5

legal representative of the plaintiff or defendant, (iii) one is privity
in estate, title or interest and the same is apparent on the face of
the record. A person having a legal grievance, which might have
deprived him of the benefit or bound by the order passed, is
entitled to the right of appeal.7 
An appeal can be preferred by any of the following persons:
 Any party to the suit adversely affected by the decree8, or
order, and where such party is dead, by his legal
representative.9
 Any transferee of the interest of such party, who, so far as
such interest is concerned, is bound by the decree10.
Waiver of one’s right to appeal
If a party agrees not to appeal or waives his right to appeal, he
cannot file an appeal and will be bound by an agreement if
otherwise such agreement is valid. Such an agreement, however,
                                             
 7 In case of doubt as to the existence of the right of appeal, the appellant may get a benefit of doubt. 8 Hafiz Mohamud v. Swamp Chand, (1942) 2 Cal 434. 9 Gajadhar v. Ganesh, (1871) 7 BomLR 149 10 Provided that his name is entered on the record of the suit. 
6

must be clear and unambiguous. Whether a party has or has not
waived his right of appeal depends upon the facts and
circumstances of each case. Similarly, where a party has accepted
the benefits under a decree of the court, he can be estopped from
questioning the legality of that decree. In Dexter’s case the court
observed: “It startles me that a person can say the judgment is
wrong and at the same time accept the payment under the
judgment as being right…. In my opinion, you cannot take the
benefit of a judgment as being good and then appeal against it as
being bad.”11 
But an agreement between the parties not to file an appeal is
valid if it is based on lawful or legal consideration and if otherwise
it is not illegal.
Appeal against ex-parte decree
                                             
 11 Dexters Ltd v. Hill Crest Oil Co. (1926) 1 KB 348
7

 Against an ex parte decree one has to file an appeal against such
a decree or order he may opt to file an application to set aside ex
parte decree.12
In an appeal against an ex parte decree, the appellate court is
competent to go into the question of the propriety or otherwise
of the ex parte decree passed by the trial court.
Whether or not an appeal lies against a consent decree
No appeal shall lie against a consent decree.13 This provision is
based on the broad principle of estoppel. It pre-supposes that the
parties to an action can, expressly or impliedly, waive or forgo
their right of appeal by any lawful agreement or compromise or
even by conduct. The consideration for the agreement involved in
the consent decree is that both the sides give up their right of
appeal.                                               
 12 See Section 96(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The only limitation is that appellant can be heard only on the merits of the case.  13 See Section 96(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Once the decree is shown to have been passed with the consent of the parties, Section 96(3) becomes operative and binds them. It creates an estoppel between the parties as a judgment on contest. Where there is a partial compromise and adjustment of a suit and a decree is passed in accordance with it, the decree to that extent is a consent decree and is not appealable. This provision, however, does not apply where the factum of compromise is in dispute or the compromise decree is challenged on the ground that such compromise had not been arrived at lawfully.

8

Appeal against preliminary decree
An appeal lies against a preliminary decree. Failure to appeal
against a preliminary decree, hence, precludes the aggrieved party
from challenging the final decree. 
Appeal against Orders
An aggrieved party can file an appeal against the judgment, where
a decree is not drawn up by the court.14
Representing the Appeal
One has a right to represent in the court of appeal, but one should
get legal advice about whether one has valid grounds to appeal. 
ESSAY REVIEW:
The Cost of Corruption  By Paolo Mauro, Paulo Medas, and Jean-Marc Fournier FD: IMF: September, 2019
An important article has been published in the latest issue
of FD, a publication of IMF in which the authors have described
the cost of corruption for a political society. The authors have
highlighted: the impact of corruption, how corrupt practices affect                                               
 14 See the provisions of Sections 104 and 105 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
9

the economies, the high spots for corruption, and the conclusions
from which policy makers can learn lessons. 
The authors emphasize on the costs of corruption as it leads
to decrease in tax revenue and causes social toll in different
directions. 
Noteworthy Points: The corruption can lead to:

 Substantial decrease in revenue collection.
 Overpayments for the purchase of goods and services.
 Distortions in spending priorities.
 Weakens the state’s ability to promote growth, as it drains
public resources away from being used for development. 
 Diminishing of the public trust in the government. 
The corrupt practices can cause:
 Unwanted tax exemptions
 Complex and opaque tax systems having discretion in the
hands tax officials.
 Reduction in revenue potential.
10

Following hot spots in this regard have been highlighted, where
possibilities of corruption are much higher:
 Oil and mining industry 
 State owned enterprises
 Discretion in the hands of top decision making authorities
 Procurement policies of the Government: 
Georgia’s Case
 The authors highlighted the case of Georgia which took
effective steps to decrease the corruption. Resultantly, the
reduction in corruption lead to: increases in tax revenue,
and tax compliance culture and these healthy policies
increased the government’s capacity to introduce welfare
oriented projects.
Lessons for policy makers: Defining the high risk areas which may include: 

 Government procurements
 Revenue administration
 Management of natural resources
11

 In-effective internal controls to check corrupt practices 
 Hiring of effective professionals who possess strong ethical
values 
The authors have emphasized that it is the duty of the
government to restore the confidence of the people in the state. 
IDEAS:
How to build resilient law firm leadership
Resilient leadership requires people to cultivate three
qualities, namely, (i) Authentic connection, (ii) Values, and (iii)
grounded optimism. 
An Authentic Connection
It is not about fitting in (having to conform to be admitted
into a group), it is about belonging (being able to show up
imperfectly and being accepted). How connected we feel to those
in our work lives can make a difference in our ability to absorb and
release the stress in a healthy way. Daily interactions make a
12

critical difference in times of challenge and change when teams
must engage in hard conversations and difficult choices.
Values
All law firms have an established set of guiding principles or
values, whether they are memorialized or not. Those values must
be applied consistently, regardless of whether they are managing
up, managing down, or working peer-to-peer. The Resilient
leaders:
 Professional value into behaviors 
 Apply those behaviors consistently across the firm
Grounded Optimism
Grounded optimism and a healthy acceptance of mistakes
make us better, healthier thinkers. Managing a challenge or
change in responsive, thoughtful ways reduces stress for
everyone. Accordingly one has to practice grounded optimism,
and to have a healthy relationship with mistakes
13

[Source: How to build Resilient Law Firm Leadership by Renee
Branson].
BOOK REVIEW:
The Game Changing Attorney By Michael Mogill Published by Lioncrest Publishing [2018]

The Game Changing Attorney is an interesting and useful book. If
you are an attorney who wants to attract one’s ideal clients in the
new legal landscape of the modern solo or small firm practice,
then it is a must read. In order to distinguish your brand and
identity the same, the author offers real insight and valuable
advice. The book teaches what lawyers need to know in the light.
The book is often-funny, and presents a honest voice of Michael,
making it an enjoyable read.
For the business of law, the author tells you the importance
of the power of emotional connection. Any law firm owner, who
wants to learn how to grow their practice exponentially, the Book
is a must-read for him. 
14

For many years to come, the book will be a go-to guide for
to grow one’s law firm. There is no doubt about the fact that one
will grow his law firm if one follows the steps out lined in the
book. This book presents fresh, honest, insightful, and jam-packed
ideas for the growth of law firms.

NEW DEVELOPMENTS:

Developments in Law

1. Contract Law 
California Court of Appeal in the case of Magic Carpet Ride
v. Rugger Investment Group, considered the following
question:
“Whether a party substantially performed its contract
obligations is a triable issue of material fact that defeats
summary adjudication; a provision in the parties’ contract
making time of the essence does not automatically make a
defendant’s untimely performance a breach of contract
15

because there are triable issues regarding the scope of that
provision and whether its enforcement would result in a
forfeiture to the defendant and a windfall to the plaintiff.”
2. Criminal Law and Procedure
California Court of Appeal in the case of People v. Lucero,
observed as under:
“A declaration containing false testimony falls within the
ambit of a book, paper, record, instrument in writing, or
other matter or thing as used in Penal Code §134; the
statute does not differentiate between real and testimonial
evidence. A document does not need to be a forgery or
altered to support a prosecution under §134; the elements
of §134 and perjury by declaration under §118(a) do not
correspond.”
3. Employment Law 
16

California Court of Appeal in the case of McCormick v.
California Public Employees’ Retirement System, observed
as under: 
“Employees are eligible for a disability retirement under the
California Public Employees’ Retirement System pursuant to
Government Code §21156 when, due to a disability, they
can no longer perform their usual duties at the only location
where their employer will allow them to work, even if they
might be able to perform those duties at a theoretical
different location.” 
4. Real Property
California Court of Appeal in the case of Denham v. City of
Richmond (Sierra Club), observed as under:
“An initiative adopted by a city council created an
impermissible conflict within the city’s general plan by
17

amending the open-space element to prohibit residential
development that the land use element continued to allow;
a court may direct a city to correct inconsistencies in its
general plan when the inconsistency is created by an
initiative amending an existing plan.”
 [Source: LACBA Briefings, October 28, 2019]
Oregon Bar USA is considering grant of licensing without a law degree

The Oregon State Bar's board of governors took major steps
to liberalize rules around para-professional licensing and allowing
people without law degrees to sit for the bar exam.
The board of governors approved recommendations from
two separate bar task forces that are intended to increase access
to justice in the state. The first recommendation is for a Para
professional licensing program, allowing grant of licenses to
individuals to provide limited legal advice without a supervising
attorney.
18

For to qualify under the program, an individual would need
to be at least 18 years of age, holds a national certification exam,
and either have an associate’s degree from an approved or
institutionally accredited paralegal studies program or a law
degree or have 1,500 hours of experience as a paralegal under an
attorney’s supervision.
The most compelling argument for licensing
paraprofessionals is that the bar’s other efforts to close the
access-to-justice gap has continued to fall short. This program
intends to broaden the options available for persons seeking to
obtain legal services, while continuing to strive for full funding of
legal aid and championing pro bono representation by lawyers.
[ABA Journal, October 7, 2019]
RECENT CASES:
International Arbitration Award Cortec Mining Kenya Ltd v. Republic of Kenya  Case NO. ARB/15/09  Decided on October 22, 2019.

19

It was a matte where Tribunal was confronted with a legal
rule that under what circumstances an international
tribunal can seize jurisdiction to decide the matter
presented before it, and in what manner questions of
Investor compliance are reviewed? Through an
international arbitration award the Tribunal while deciding
the moot points considered the following important
principles of law:
 Where a mining license was obtained in violation of
domestic law, was it legal? 
 Whether or not they obtained rights are protected. 
 What are the effects of violations of domestic law?
 Whether or not a claimant is under burden to establish
jurisdiction under BIT and ICSID conventions. 
The Tribunal in this regard ruled that:
 An investor has to follow and meet substantial compliance
requirements prescribed by the host state. The Tribunal
20

case to the conclusion that issue of compliance with
domestic law was considered as central and focal point. 
 The investor has to establish that required licensing was
acquired in compliance with domestic law so as to make the
investment as protected one.
 The acquisition of licensing must not be an act of favor and
must meet all the required criteria. 
 Procedural defects are considered as violation. 
 Where an act was ab-initio void, it makes the investment
non-protected, as matter going out of the scope of Tribunal.
 International investment agreements only protect
investments made in compliance with domestic law. [see
Inceysa v. EL Salvadar, where the Tribunal found that it
lacked jurisdiction concerning an investment made in
breach of applicable law]15
                                             
 15 On the other hand where a government fails to discharge its burden of proof and it fails to show that the investor had violated the legality clause it had no case. 
21

 The purpose of international investment regime cannot be
to protect investment made in violation of the laws of host
state.
 There exists a requirements of due diligence on the part of
investor to ensure their activities comply with domestic law. 
 All agreements must be made in good faith.
 An investment like a licence (which is creative of the laws of
the host state) stands linked with an implied legality
requirement to the notion of investment under the ICSID
convention. 
 Where a license has been obtained in compliance with the
domestic law, it becomes a protected investment under BIT.
 Legal compliance issues are an evolving topic in investment
treaty making.
 However, a note of caution is that international arbitral
tribunals may have limited expertise to interpret domestic
legal requirements and it leads to a problem area in the
22

coordinated application of domestic and international
norms. 
SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 

Anti Terrorism law, explained by the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
The court observed that the law prohibits possession of
inflammatory materials, and where the same is recovered from
the possession of an accused whether or not the same was
distributed, the act of possession of such inflammatory material
by itself is an offence within the framework of Anti-Terrorism Law.
[Qari Muhammad Ishaq Ghazi v. The State: 2019 SCMR 1646

Wednesday, 19 October 2016

American Jurisprudence and International Law by Zafar Iqbal

In an age of a conflict arising out of individual liberty and national security, the US Supreme Court has maintained a balanced approach towards interpreting the presidential actions concerning national security and in many instances, the court restrained to intervene following the principle that laws are silent during wartime. During major wars namely, civil war, World War I and World War II, the US Supreme Court restrained itself to intervene in matters relating to protection of individual liberty. The lower courts, however, invoked the political question doctrine as a basis for declining to decide issues concerning Vietnam War. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court, showed willingness to resolve cases of national security but interpreted presidential powers very broadly, for example, Curtis-Wright decision,1 and in the infamous Korematsu decision, the court showed broad deference to executive powers.2

It was the steel case in which the US Supreme Court held that President Trueman had exceeded his powers by seizing the steel mills in the country during the Korean War.3 The case marked a shift in the court's approach. The court took the view that during the war, President does not have a 'blank check'. Similarly, the decisions on war on terror lead to the development of contextual case-by-case approach.

Compared to the past and in order to decide national security cases, the US courts nowadays seek information on the subject matter in more detail. The US courts also consider the fact that how other countries in the world have sorted out similar problems, as their examples can enable the US courts to find out the real constitutional problems.

In American jurisprudence, the subject of international commerce revolves around four important cases, namely, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd v. Empagran S.A.,4 Intel Corp v. Advance Micro Devices Inc,5 Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd,6 and Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons Inc 7 In these cases the Supreme Court was confronted with the following problems:

a) The extra-territorial application of the US anti-trust law;

b) The ability to obtain discovery of evidence relating to foreign proceedings;

c) Extra-territorial application of the securities fraud statute; and

d) Application of 'first sale' doctrine in the US copyright law in respect of goods first sold outside the United States.

In these cases, the US Supreme Court considered the reciprocity of the application of the US laws abroad and the court came to the following conclusions: 

a) The US Supreme Court ordinarily construes ambiguous statutes to avoid unreasonable interference with the sovereign authority of other nations.8

b) The Supreme Court may consider the international comity in deciding whether and to what extent to apply US laws abroad. In the court's conception of comity, the view one emphasising the more formal objective of simple conflict avoidance to the more practical objective of maintaining co-operative working arrangements with corresponding enforcement authorities of different nations is generally favoured.

In the case of Filartiga v. Pena-Irala9, the US Supreme Court was confronted with the issue of human rights and in the case of Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain10 the court closed this open issue. The Sosa case was misinterpreted by lower courts as suits under ATS law against multinational corporations continued to increase and led to emergence of conflict in foreign relations.

Attention is drawn towards the US Supreme Court's decision namely, Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co11 in more detail where the Court had held that: 

i. Under ATS law, the claims are subject to presumption against extra-territoriality;

ii. Relief sought in the case was refused as these claims demanded a relief for the violations of the laws of foreign nations occurring outside United States.12

Many readers interpreted this case in a narrow sense; the fact is that the decision does not bar claims by victims of foreign human rights abuses when brought against individuals residing in the United States.

In a few notable cases, the emphasis has been on the Hague convention and on the civil aspects of international child abduction.13 In another case, Abbott v. Abbott the US Supreme Court considered the custody right under the international convention.14 In Lozano v. Montoya Alvarez, the court considered whether or not in the given timeframe and under the convention, the case fell within the framework of equity.15 These cases show that how the court extended its learning scope with regard to foreign laws, customs and practices.

A special note had been taken by the Supreme Court in the case of BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina.16 In this case, the court concluded that:

I. A US court should give deference to an arbitral panel's interpretation of a local litigation requirement provided in an investment treaty arbitration clause.

II. How can courts exercise judicial review of arbitral decisions to ensure that awards are fair and consistent with domestic laws, without undermining the efficiency and neutrality of the arbitral system?

Many international organisations have now taken over the traditional tasks of domestic governments. And an element of uncertainty did emerge that to what extent the National Constitution permits the role assumed by the international organisations or in other words, to what extent the Constitution permits delegation of authority to such international institutions. For example, in the case of NRDC v. EPA17 a circuit court questioned the validity and binding effect of a decision made on the basis of Montreal Protocol on certain chemical substances. The issue of international delegation has not yet been dealt by the US Supreme Court.18 In Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon, the court gave respect and full consideration to the ICJ's reasoning concerning the effect of Article 36 on domestic rules of procedural default but ultimately disagreed with that reasoning.19

The issue, "whether or not a Judgement of the International Court of Justice was self executing," also came for consideration before the US Supreme Court in the case of Modellin v. Texes, and the Court took the view that commitment of the United States under Article 94 of the United Nations Charter to undertake to comply with ICJ's decision was not self-executing and did not cause to pre-empt state's law.20

In the US Supreme Court's decision in the case of Bond v. United States, the issue involved a federal criminal prosecution relating to chemical weapons convention.21 The court did not address the constitutional scope of treaty power and the earlier decision on this subject namely; Missouri v. Holland22 still remains valid in the field, in that case the court had held that the treaty power is not subject to constraints of federalism that apply to domestic legislation.23

One must keep in mind the fact that the Supreme Court of the United States is a domestic court, not an international court. And the court intended to learn and apply foreign laws and practices and in this regard, one justice of Supreme Court shows his sympathy towards this attitude of the court, and though he rejects the critics of the court's such practices on ground that new realities of the world are to be accepted, he is of the view that decision-making is a kind of problem solving.

The US institutions are showing interest that how they can take benefit from ECJ's practice of proportionality analysis and its approach towards regulations relating to commerce, and that of Indian court's experience with ADR to decrease the pendency.

In respect of the US Supreme Court's approach towards international cases, following trends are emerging: 

a) A serious judicial engagement;

b) Contextual case by case deliberation26A

In many cases, the US Supreme Court has gone for a categorical approach rather than contextual.24 Even in cases related to war on terror, barring a few, the court allowed the government to work and avoided review on detention and use of force.25

Even in Kiobel case, the extra-territorial presumption though became applicable, yet in view of the majority; the claimants living in the United States could still sue for compensation.26 However, as per majority where the conduct under review took place outside US, the claims under ATS become liable for rejection.27

However, despite the said arguments, in Kiobel case, the decanting point of view states that:

a. The approach of limiting the ATS to situations in which relevant conduct occurs outside the United States is not correct;

b. The statute should be applied whenever defendant's conduct implicates an important American national interest28; and

c. The country is to be prevented from becoming a safe harbour for a torturer or other common enemies of mankind.29

(The writer is an advocate and is currently working as an associate with Azim-ud-Din Law Associates Karachi)

1. See United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp, 299 US 304, 319 (1936). Recently in Zivotofsky v. Kerry, 135 S.Ct. 2076, 2090 (2015), the Supreme Court distanced itself from some of the dicta in Curtiss Wright.

2. See Korematsu v. United States, 323 US 214, 218-19 (1944).

3. See Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co V. Sawyer (Steel Seizure), 343 US 579 (1952)

4. Empagran, 542 US 155

5. Intel Corp v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc, 542 US 241 (2004)

6. Morrison v. Nat'l Austl. Bank Ltd, 561 US 247 (2010)

7. Kirtsaeng v. John Wiey & Sons, Inc, 133 S.Ct 1351 (2013)

8. Empagran, 542 US at 164.

9. Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cit. 1980)

10. Sosa v. Alverez-Machain, 542 US 962 (2004)

11. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co, 133 S.Ct 1659 (2013)

12. Id. At 1669

13. Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction opened for signature October 25, 1980, TIAS 11,760, 1343 UNTS 98.

14. See Abbott v. Abbott, 560 US 1 (2010).

15. See Lozano v. Montoya Alvarez, 134 S. Cr. 1224 (2014).

16. BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina, 134 S. Ct. 1198 (2014)

17. See NRDC v. EPA, 464 F.3d 1, 9 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (discussing Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer, September, 16, 1987, S. Treaty Doc. No 100-10 (1987), 1522 UNTS 3, 26 ILM 1550 (1987).

18. Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, Article 36, Apr. 24 1963, 21 UST 77596 UNTS261. The closest that it has come has been in cases considering the effect of decisions by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) concerning. US non-compliance with Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, which provides that when a party country arrests nationals from another party country, the former is supposed to advise them of their right to have their consulate notified of the arrest and to communicate with the consulate.

19. Medellin v. Texas, 552 US 491, 508-10 (2008) (quoting UN Charter Art. 94 (1)). Despite being a dissenter in Sanchez Llamas, Justice Breyer fairly presents the majority's reasoning and usefully underscores that the majority was not claiming that the United States may ignore ICJ judgements.

20. Modellin v. Texas 552 US 491, 508-10 (2008) (quoting UN Charter Art. 94 (1)). Again despite not having joined the majority opinion, Justice Breyer treats it with respect noting: "Naturally, since I wrote the dissent, I am persuaded by its reasoning, but that is beside the point. The Courts majority opinion is authoritative, not the dissent. So it is more important to consider the significance of that opinion".

21. See Bond v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 2077 (2014) (discussing ratification of the Convention on the prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and use of Chemical Weapon and on their Destruction, January 13, 1993, S. Treaty Doc. No 103-21 (1993), 1974 UNTS 45, 32 ILM 800 (1993)).

22. Missouri v. Holland, 252 US 416 (1920)

23. See Bond, 134 S. Ct at 2091; see also Curtis A. Bradley, Bond, Clear Statement Requirements, and Political Process, AJIL. UNBOUND (June 3, 2014). Instead, the Court in Bond made use of statutory interpretation to cut back on the domestic application of the Chemical Weapons Conventions, reasoning that even a statute implementing a treaty should not be presumed to alter the usual balance of federal and state power absent a clear indication of congressional intent to do so.

26A In Morrison and Kiobel the court opted for a categorical approach to extra territoriality rather than more contextual approach.

24. Compare Medellin, 552 US at 550-51 (Breyer, J., dissenting), with id. At 514-15 (majority opinion) (rejecting the dissent's proposed approach on the ground that it is too indeterminate and ad hoc).

25. See Curtis A. Bradley, Foreign Relations Law and the Purported Shift Away from "Exceptionalism," 128 HARV. L. REV. F. 294, 298-99 (2014)

26. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co, 133 S.Ct 1659, 1669 (2013)

27. Id. (emphasis added).

28. See Id at 1674 (Breyer, J., concurring) (emphasis added).

29. Id at 1671
Copyright Business Recorder, 2016